Cases 41 - 50 of 111,936
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Massey v. Bridegroom et al
as 3:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Aaron Christopher Massey
Defendant:
Nichole Bridegroom, James Jackson and John Galipeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESTATE OF KATHARINE SARANAM JOHNSTON v. FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF KATHARINE SARANAM JOHNSTON
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA, FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, DAN FOREMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MINGS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
REBECCA J. MINGS and REBECCA JANE MINGS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wilson v. Mayes
as 3:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Billy Asher Wilson
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stonebraker et al v. LF2 Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Mason Stonebraker and Tiffany Edwards
Defendant:
LF2 Inc., LF4 Inc., LF7 Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BUTLER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY EUGENE BUTLER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and BRILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKLIN et al v. SNYDER et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE FRANKLIN and ALANA FRANKLIN
Defendant:
GRANT SNYDER, KURT WOLFE and LAFAYETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIMMONS-TAYLOR v. HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
TWANA SIMMONS-TAYLOR
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL doing business as HAMILTON TRACE OF FISHERS, CARDON MANAGEMENT COMPANY II LLC and CARDON & ASSOCIATES INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
