Cases 41 - 50 of 90,122
McCrory v. Hamm (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Charles McCrory
Defendant:
John Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reese v. Huggins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Cedric Anthony Reese
Defendant:
Thomas Huggins and Blake Turman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Erramraju v. Blount County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Ramaraju Rom Erramraju
Defendant:
Blount County Jail, Mark Moon, Blount County Jail Medical Infirmary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Ladarius Kintia Anderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Henley v. Calloway et al
as 7:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Nikita Roland Henley
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunlap v. Cincinnati Insurance Company (CONSENT)
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Steven Robert Dunlap and Steven Robert Dunlap, Jr.
Defendant:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
American Strategic Insurance Corp v. Hall et al
as 3:2024cv00520
Defendant:
Constance R. Hall, Constance Renee Isbell, Donald Shane Isbell and others
Plaintiff:
American Strategic Insurance Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Hill v. City of Birmingham, The
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Brinceton Hill
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
