Cases 51 - 60 of 412
HERESCO v. NETSPEND CORPORATION
as 2:2020cv01869
Defendant:
NETSPEND CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HERESCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALEKSANDR v. PNC BANK
as 2:2020cv01140
Plaintiff:
YUZHAKOV ALEKSANDR
Defendant:
PNC BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAKER v. LINCOLN PARK BANCORP et al
as 2:2020cv08731
Defendant:
STEPHEN DORMER, LINCOLN 1ST BANK, LINCOLN PARK BANCORP and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FIORANI v. PNC BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2020cv03200
Defendant:
KAREN HICKS, CHRISTABEL IFEOMA OBI, SHERRY COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
ROASRIO "ROSS" FIORANI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Williams et al v. Oriental Bank, Successor in intrest to the Bank of Nova Scotia
as 1:2020cv00026
Plaintiff:
Averricia Williams and Lunsford A. Williams
Defendant:
Oriental Bank, Successor in intrest to the Bank of Nova Scotia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DRAZDIK V DIRECTOR INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ET AL
as 2:2020cv00549
Plaintiff:
ANDREW STEPHEN DRAZDIK, JR.
Defendant:
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, PENNSYLVANIA STATE BUREAU, DIRECTOR INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
as 2:2020cv00476
Plaintiff:
CAITLIN STONE
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PITTS et al v. CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv00206
Plaintiff:
MR. KORRY PITTS, MRS. KIMBERLEY PITTS and 412 MOTORING, LLC
Defendant:
SEAN CONROY, GARY NORRIS, CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. PINAULT
as 2:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
ASIA JOHNSON
Defendant:
FRANCOIS PINAULT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOCSIS v. ANTHIUM, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KOCSIS
Defendant:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, ANTHIUM, LLC, CAM LOAN SERVICING and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
