Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Valenzuela v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2009cv01833
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, William White, Charles Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valenzuela v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2009cv01427
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, William White, Charles Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Sanders et al
as 4:2008cv00291
Petitioner:
Tyrone Vaughn Henry
Respondent:
David Sanders and Paula Schlecht
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. Barker et al
as 2:2008cv00190
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Holmes
Defendant:
Russell Barker, Vaughn Becker, Don Layton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Palmer v. Schriro et al
as 2:2007cv02597
Petitioner:
Vaughn Palmer
Respondent:
Dora B Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Cruikshank, et. al
as 4:2007cv00631
Petitioner:
Tyrone Vaughn Henry
Respondent:
Michael Cruikshank and Pima County Adult Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson
as 2:2007cv01734
Petitioner:
Derrick Vaughn Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stevenson v. Schriro, et al
as 2:2007cv01735
Petitioner:
Derrick Vaughn Stevenson
Respondent:
Dora B Schriro, Mary Hennessey and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Giedraitis et al
as 2:2007cv01633
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lori Giedraitis, Amy Vaughn, Lainn Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Cruikshank, et al
as 4:2007cv00230
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Vaughn Henry
Defendant:
Michael Cruikshank, Barbara LaWall, David Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
