Cases 51 - 60 of 454
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv01856
Defendant:
Rose P Snow, Deidra Wright, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01835
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wright v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2020cv01729
Plaintiff:
Missy Ann Wright
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Jackson et al
as 2:2020cv01710
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe Owner of G Unit Films Corporation, John Doe Owner of ABC 33/40 Corporation, Isiah Wright, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. Logan et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2020cv00878
Defendant:
Officer Messer, Officer Osburn, Officer Logan and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan L. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Nurses Staff of Covington County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00834
Defendant:
Betty Long, Thomas Huggins, Nurses Staff of Covington County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Edward Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CM Vantage Specialty Insurance Company v. Mayflower Investments, LLC, et al
as 2:2020cv00614
Defendant:
Mayflower Investments, LLC, Vakita Ragland, Demecia Wright and others
Plaintiff:
CM Vantage Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Wright v. Davis et al
as 1:2020cv00407
Defendant:
Officer Ming, Lt. Davis and Officer Price
Plaintiff:
Danny Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
