Cases 51 - 60 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kimble, Bobby v. Boughton, Gary et al
as 3:2019cv01011
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kimble
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Simcox, Doug Percy, Larry Fuchs and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ambeau v. Klemann et al
as 2:2019cv01616
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr, Jennifer Homalsk, Tony Evers and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Ambeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Brooks
as 1:2019cv01294
Plaintiff:
Clifton Robinson
Defendant:
Dave Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pirtle v. Brooks et al
as 2:2019cv01078
Defendant:
S Schueler, Markee, Emily Davidson and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin J Pirtle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant et al v. Walmart Inc
as 2:2019cv00930
Not Yet Classified:
WEA Insurance Corporation
Cross Claimant:
Brooks Tractor Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Teresa Bryant
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tatum, Robert v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2019cv00528
Defendant:
Jay VanLanen, Caleb Zitek, Brad Hompe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Tatum
Not Yet Classified:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCallum, Shasta v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2019cv00468
Defendant:
Mike Larson, Guardian Ad Litem Lisa Schultz, Shannon Dewey and others
Plaintiff:
Shasta Casey McCallum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. CNH Industrial America LLC
as 2:2019cv00765
Plaintiff:
Stanley Chad Brooks
Defendant:
CNH Industrial America LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In the matter N.M.H et al
as 3:2019cv00415
Plaintiff:
N.M.H, Shasta McCallum and Shasta Casey McCallum
Defendant:
Rock County Child Protective Services, The Rock County Family Court, Attorney Jennifer Nash Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
