Cases 51 - 60 of 61,975
Freeman v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv02424
Plaintiff:
Kaylee Freeman
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Wootton v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Troy Wootton
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Czeskleba v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Czeskleba
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sobczyk v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Sobczyk
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Unique Brooks v. Felts, et al
as 24-5571
Plaintiff:
UNIQUE BROOKS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FELTS, Sued in their individual and official capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COLEMAN, Sued in their individual and official capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LOWERY, Sued in their individual and official capacity and others
Phillips v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Phillips
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Taylor v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Shirlie Taylor
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv05203
Plaintiff:
Wykishia Maya Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Simonson v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv01292
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Simonson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Zavaleta v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05219
Plaintiff:
Astrid Zavaleta
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
