Cases 51 - 60 of 134
Thornsberry v. McElroy et al
as 5:2016cv05188
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Thornsberry
Defendant:
McElroy , James Sharp and Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantrell v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2016cv00536
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant:
John Felts, Benny Magness, Shelia Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luebker v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2016cv00537
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Lee Luebker
Defendant:
Little Rock, City of, John Felts, Benny Magness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkinson v. Sharp County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
William Dean Atkinson
Defendant:
Sharp County Detention Facility, Mark Counts, Stan Haney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Counts et al
as 1:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Clark
Defendant:
Mark Counts, Stan Haney, Sharp County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Sharp County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Clark
Defendant:
Sharp County Jail, Mark Counts, Mark Haney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cossey v. Counts et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Billy Jo Cossey
Defendant:
Mark Counts, Sharp County Sheriff Department, Angela Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Vailes et al
as 4:2016cv00489
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
Ashley Vailes, Kimberly Harvey, Sheila Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantrell v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Asa Hutchinson, Little Rock, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. Felts et al
as 4:2016cv00276
Plaintiff:
Greg Farmer
Defendant:
John Felts, James L Williams, II, Tammuala Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
