Cases 51 - 60 of 110
Shaw v. Appling County Detention Center et al
as 2:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Waymon D. Shaw
Defendant:
Appling County Detention Center, Adam Bell, Mark Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ocampo v. Appling Healthcare System et al
as 2:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Ocampo
Defendant:
Appling Healthcare System and Appling County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dasher v. Eunice et al
as 2:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Danny Dashaun Dasher
Defendant:
Robert Eunice, Toyna Carter and The Appling County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Evans et al
as 2:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Vernon Lee Tyson
Defendant:
Jeff Evans and Appling County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trejo-Hernandez v. Red Apple Enterprise, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Filia Trejo-Hernandez
Defendant:
Red Apple Enterprise, Inc. and Baoguo Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WARDLAW v EDWARDS, et al
as 3:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
DEREK WARDLAW
Defendant:
IRA EDWARDS, GRACE SPENCE, DAVID JARED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States et al v. One Sony Play Station (2) et al
as 1:2016mi00079
Plaintiff:
United States
Claimant:
Kenneth Shipp
Defendant:
One Sony Play Station (2), One Sony Play Station (3), One Nintendo Wii w/ Cords and Controls and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Studstill v. Appling County et al
as 2:2016cv00130
Plaintiff:
Kelby Studstill
Defendant:
Appling County , Appling County Sheriff's Department and Benny Deloach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wardlaw v. Edwards et al
as 1:2016cv02067
Plaintiff:
Derek Wardlaw
Defendant:
Ira Edwards, Grace Spence, David Jared and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quarterman v. Strickland et al
as 1:2016cv00644
Defendant:
Timothy Strickland, Ryan Jones, Thomas Apple and others
Plaintiff:
Kenny Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
