Cases 51 - 60 of 667
Carter v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Sanders M Carter
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angel v. Arkansas, State of
as 3:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Micah Angel
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
McKaig v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
Samuel Tobin McKaig
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Angel v. Arkansas State Police
as 3:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Micah Angel
Defendant:
Arkansas State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sanders v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2022cv01240
Plaintiff:
Jason Sanders
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolfe v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 3:2022cv03058
Plaintiff:
Ray D. Wolfe
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Missouri, State of, Gail Inman Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Marlon T Myers
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashford v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2022cv00827
Plaintiff:
Charles Ashford and Charles Edward Ashford
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Tashyra Powell
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Arkansas Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Powell v. Does et al
as 4:2022cv01059
Plaintiff:
Tashyra Powell
Defendant:
Does Local Hospital, Health Department and Arkansas State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
