Cases 51 - 60 of 2,046
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2463
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2464
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2406
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cardell Hunes
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Larry Norris)
Lonnie Strawhacker v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2313
Petitioner:
Lonnie Dolphus Strawhacker
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Frank Watts, II v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 23-2284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Watts, II
Defendant / Appellee:
Asa Hutchinson, Hon. Governor, and/or His Predecessors & Successor, Morris Thompson, Former Cir. Ct. Judge & Law Firm, and/or His Successor, Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, and/or Her Predecessors & Successor and others
Vance v. McCown
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Preston Vick Vance, Jr
Defendant:
P McCown, Arkansas Department of Correction, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2214
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Michael Pickens v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Pickens
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Damien Ford v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Damien Ford
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Wendy Kelley)
Hillhouse v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Hillhouse
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections and Varner Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
