Cases 51 - 60 of 2,050
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2588
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Gary T. Cloird v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2511
Petitioner:
Gary T. Cloird, also known as Saba Makkali
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Aaron Crift v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2469
Petitioner:
Aaron Crift
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Fredrick Pennington, Jr. v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-2478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frederick Pennington, Jr. and Fredrick Pennington, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Leslie Rutledge, Former Arkansas Attorney General, Terri Hollingsworth, Pulaski Circuit Clerk and others
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2463
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2464
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2406
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cardell Hunes
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Larry Norris)
Lonnie Strawhacker v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2313
Petitioner:
Lonnie Dolphus Strawhacker
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Frank Watts, II v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 23-2284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Watts, II
Defendant / Appellee:
Asa Hutchinson, Hon. Governor, and/or His Predecessors & Successor, Morris Thompson, Former Cir. Ct. Judge & Law Firm, and/or His Successor, Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, and/or Her Predecessors & Successor and others
Vance v. McCown
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Preston Vick Vance, Jr
Defendant:
P McCown, Arkansas Department of Correction, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
