Cases 51 - 60 of 92
REED v. BOWEN et al
as 2:2016cv00319
Defendant:
BENSON, MARK J. BOWEN, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WAYNE REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWEN v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01877
Plaintiff:
LAURA L. BOWEN
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Northwest Indiana Painters Welfare Fund et al v. Bowen's Decorating Service Inc
as 2:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Northwest Indiana Local 460 District Council 91, IUPAT, AFL-CIO , Jim Loftis , James Mitchell, Sr and others
Defendant:
Bowen's Decorating Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BOWENS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv00801
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BOWENS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOWERS v. HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv00285
Defendant:
CHRISTINE ALTMAN, MARK J. BOWEN, STEVEN C. DILLINGER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOWERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BOWEN v. KNIGHT
as 1:2014cv01711
Petitioner:
RAYMOND BOWEN
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
