Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Martin v. Oliphant Financial, LLC
as 5:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Judy Bowen Martin
Defendant:
Oliphant Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WOOLARD v. PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
MARK WOOLARD
Defendant:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc., POTASH COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
REEVES v. RANSOM et al
as 1:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. REEVES
Defendant:
CHANDRA RANSOM, MICHAEL AIKENS, KENNETH LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REEVES v. RANSOM et al
as 1:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. REEVES
Defendant:
CHANDRA RANSOM, MICHAEL AIKENS, KENNETH LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2009cv00456
Plaintiff:
Brian Bruce Bowen and Sally Bergman Bowen
Defendant:
3M Company, A. W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Bowen v. Galbreath et al
as 3:2009cv00165
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Kay Moser Bowen
Defendant:
Kevin Russell Galbreath and Crete Carrier Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lawrence v. Cooper et al
as 5:2009ct03055
Plaintiff:
Jimmie W Lawrence, Jimmie W Lawrence and Jimmie W Lawrence
Defendant:
Roy A. Cooper, III, Gail E. Dawson, Sandra W Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bowens v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2009hc02002
Petitioner:
Martinez A. Bowens
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
