Cases 51 - 60 of 258
BOYD v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2020cv00393
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
ROBERT BOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILSON v. UNITED STATES PROBATION SYSTEM et al
as 2:2020cv00275
Respondent:
DICK BROWN, CRIMINAL DIVISION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Petitioner:
JAMES G. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AJAJ v. KRUGER et al
as 2:2020cv00244
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JASON DODGE, DAVID FLOYD and others
Plaintiff:
AHMAD M. AJAJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. SHAFFER et al
as 2:2020cv00210
Defendant:
T. CARMICHAEL, ROBERTSON, D. KRAEMER and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACKSON et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2020cv00116
Defendant:
AMANDA ADAMS, T.J. WATSON, ISHMAEL OLIVER and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY RAY JACKSON and MUHAMMAD AHMAD AJAJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SULLIVAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2020cv00144
Defendant:
B. TRUE, CLARKE, PAYNE and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN NOJAN SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARNER v. MILLER et al
as 2:2019cv00347
Defendant:
MILLER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and COX
Plaintiff:
STEVE J. GARNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ballard v. Sessions et al
as 2:2019cv00260
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Marce Gonzalez, Lexington Kentucky Medical Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN v. WATSON et al
as 2:2019cv00184
Defendant:
USP-TERRE HAUTE/HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION AND UNKNOWN STAFF (DOCTORS) AND (PHYSICIANS ASSISTANTS), KRUGER, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cantu v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2019cv00355
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cantu, Sr and Tony Cantu
Defendant:
Crawford, French, Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
