Cases 51 - 60 of 151
PARENTO et al v. BELFOR USA GROUP, INC.
as 1:2016cv06016
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PARENTO and MARY PARENTO
Defendant:
BELFOR USA GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Belfor USA Group Inc v. Global Gaming RP LLC
as 5:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
Belfor USA Group Inc
Defendant:
Global Gaming RP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Belfor USA Group, Inc. v. Lewis
as 6:2015cv02045
Plaintiff:
Belfor USA Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Victoria Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv61567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nora Shamalian v. Travelers Commercial Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv04466
Defendant:
Belfor USA Group, Inc., Does, Horizon Cleaners of SoCal, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Nora Shamalian
Belfor USA Group Inc v. Reynolds et al
as 6:2015cv02318
Plaintiff:
Belfor USA Group Inc
Defendant:
Larry A Reynolds and Marsha E Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv11882
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seneca Insurance Company, Inc. v. Strange Land, Inc., et al
as 15-16011
Plaintiff-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
STRANGE LAND, INC. and U.S. BANK
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
BELFOR USA GROUP, INC., DBA Belfor Property Restoration
Belfor USA Group Inc v. Banks et al
as 2:2015cv01818
Plaintiff:
Belfor USA Group Inc
Defendant:
James Banks and Rebecca Banks
Counter_claimant:
Rebecca Banks and James Banks
Counter_defendant:
Belfor USA Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEFF v. BELFOR USA GROUP, INC .
as 2:2015cv02275
Plaintiff:
JASON LEFF
Defendant:
BELFOR USA GROUP, INC .
Counter_claimant:
BELFOR USA GROUP, INC .
Counter_defendant:
JASON LEFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
