Cases 51 - 60 of 25,632
Hardy v. Bell (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Hardy
Defendant:
William A. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Brown, Green and Control
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Leavenworth Penitentiary et al
as 5:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bell
Defendant:
Leavenworth U.S. Penitentiary, D. Hudson, (fnu) McMillen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bell v. Leavenworth Penitentiary et al
as 3:2024cv50200
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bell
Defendant:
Leavenworh Penitentiary, Warden D. Hudson, McMillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neal v. Killeen Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Danny O'Neal
Defendant:
Killeen Police Department and Bell County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Hall et al
as 6:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Reggie Montel Powell
Defendant:
Billy Ray Hall, Bell County Law Enforcement Center and Officer S. Blue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith-Lane v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04432
Plaintiff:
Teresa Smith-Lane
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCAULEY v. NEWREZ LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
DEREK STEVEN MCCAULEY
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC, SHANNON O'CONNELL EGAN, CATHY DONDZILA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WYATT'S TORCH, INC. v. OPTUMRX, INC.
as 1:2024cv06495
Plaintiff:
WYATT'S TORCH, INC. doing business as BELL PHARMACY
Defendant:
OPTUMRX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
