Cases 51 - 60 of 105
BENITES v. VARRILLAS et al
as 2:2014cv03298
Petitioner:
NELSON MOISES ZEVALLOS BENITES
Respondent:
JESSICA ZENOBIA FERRO VARRILLAS, LISSETTE KATE FERRO VARRILLAS and LINA ESTHER VARILLA VILCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diogenes Romero v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-70516
Petitioner:
DIOGENES BENITES ROMERO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Bolton v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05991
Defendant:
Police Officer Pamela Benites, City of New York and Police Officers 1-20 John Doe
Plaintiff:
Alexander Bolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marie Lueck, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC.
as 13-80193
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MARIE LUECK, ANGELA ANDRE, ROBERT D. LUECK and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC.
SHELTON v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 5:2013cv04667
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE SHELTON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER , RYAN COSTELLO , KATHI COZZONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lueck et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03167
Plaintiff:
Marie Lueck , Angela Andre , Robert D. Lueck and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lueck et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-03167
Plaintiff:
Marie Lueck , Angela Andre , Robert D. Lueck and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Eric Antonio Benites v. Connie Gipson
as 2:2013cv04362
Petitioner:
Eric Antonio Benites
Respondent:
Connie Gipson
Biggs v. Arone et al
as 3:2013cv00334
Plaintiff:
James L. Biggs, III
Defendant:
Leo C. Arone, Peter Murphy, Benites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benites v. The Palms Hotel South Beach, Inc.
as 1:2013cv20788
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Benites
Defendant:
The Palms Hotel South Beach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
