Cases 51 - 60 of 116
Prescott v. Fox et al
as 2:2018cv00965
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Prescott
Defendant:
Officer Fox, Corpal Ford, Officer Quick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGrew v. Home Depot USA Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01824
Plaintiff:
Leroy Burns McGrew
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc, Dorchester County Sheriff's Office and M C Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. Burns et al
as 9:2017cv01552
Plaintiff:
Rahmad I Norman
Defendant:
Officer Burns, Tim Riley, Asst Warden Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Dalton et al
as 5:2017cv01295
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Ha'Keem Burns
Defendant:
Officer Dalton, Director Myers, Co-Director Kitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Camden, City of et al
as 3:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
Blanche Scott
Defendant:
Camden, City of , John Burns , Charles Cushman, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vivia Artz et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03893
Plaintiff:
Vivia Artz , Marilyn Alexander , Cathy Anderson and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Burns v. Mullis et al
as 3:2016cv02586
Plaintiff:
Brittany Burns
Defendant:
Phillip Mullis and Butler Herman Luke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowser v. Burns Chevrolet Cadillac Inc et al
as 0:2016cv01551
Plaintiff:
Teqoun Q Bowser
Defendant:
Burns Chevrolet Cadillac Inc and John Does 1-10
Counter_claimant:
Burns Chevrolet Cadillac Inc
Counter_defendant:
Teqoun Q Bowser
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Centeno v. Meeks et al
as 4:2016cv01482
Plaintiff:
Alexis Centeno
Defendant:
J Meeks, Simmons, Ray Burn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
W.S. v. Daniels et al
as 8:2016cv01032
Plaintiff:
W.S.
Defendant:
Cassandra Daniels , Ursula Best , South Carolina Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
