Cases 51 - 60 of 67
RUIZ v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv03304
Plaintiff:
MARIANITO RUIZ
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , MCCABE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beauvoir v. Doe et al
as 9:2014cv01495
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Beauvoir
Defendant:
John Doe, c/o John Doe # 1, c/o Philip #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beauvoir v. Doe et al
as 1:2014cv09593
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Beauvoir
Defendant:
John Doe, c/o John Doe # 1, c/o Philip #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foust v. Jacobs
as 2:2014cv01228
Defendant:
Cpl. Akers, c/o Berry, Sgt. Bevins and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Andrew Foust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralph James Palazzo v. John Doe et al
as 2:2013cv04370
Defendant:
California C/O John Doe and Wasco State Prison
Plaintiff:
Ralph James Palazzo
Johnson v. NDOC et al
as 2:2013cv00110
Defendant:
R. Baker, Brown, Lt. Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justice v. C/O Merchant et al
as 2:2012cv05103
Defendant:
C/O John Doe #1, C/O John Doe #2, C/O Merchant and others
Plaintiff:
Allah F. Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. DeMarco et al
as 2:2012cv04683
Jane Doe:
C/O Daniell
Defendant:
Vincent DeMarco and C/O John Doe
Jon Doe:
Sgt. Kursey
Plaintiff:
Cordell Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2012cv04549
Defendant:
County of Nassau, Corp. John Doe, C/O John Doe #1- #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodroffe v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2012cv00124
Defendant:
Cpl. Adamson, Walter M. Beglau, Brian Beleque and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
