Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Tipton v. Carpenter et al
as 4:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
Brannon Tipton
Defendant:
Brett Carpenter and Tonya Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Carpenter et al
as 4:2017cv00166
Defendant:
Brett Carpenter and Tonya Parker
Plaintiff:
Micheal Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Wallace et al
as 4:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Matthew W Barnett
Defendant:
James Wallace, John Felts, Jenny Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dewayne Stewart
Defendant:
Leon Johnson, Kayce Green, William Robert Simpson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff v. Rousey et al
as 4:2016cv00807
Plaintiff:
Belynda Faye Goff
Defendant:
Archie L Rousey, Carroll County Sheriff's Department, Robert Gregory Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Martin et al
as 4:2016cv00591
Plaintiff:
Ricky Franklin
Defendant:
Tina Martin, Jake Pennington, Mark Dance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downwind LLC et al v. United States Department of Energy et al
as 3:2016cv00207
Plaintiff:
Downwind LLC and Golden Bridge LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Energy , Ernest Moniz , Southwestern Power Administration and others
Movant:
Plains & Eastern Clean Line Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Williams v. Felts et al
as 4:2016cv00566
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Defendant:
John Felts, Jimmy Wallace, Abraham Carpenter, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garry v. Vandiver et al
as 4:2016cv00314
Plaintiff:
Perry Garry
Defendant:
Dawn B Vandiver, Jimmy Wallace, Donna Cobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Carpenter et al
as 4:2016cv00268
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Berry
Defendant:
Abraham Carpenter, James Wallace, John Belken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
