Cases 51 - 60 of 2,397
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Chan v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Sophia Chan
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES v. CHAN
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Defendant:
ELVIS CHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chan v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Kar Wai Chan
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
CHAN v. RENE et al
as 2:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
YUNG F CHAN
Defendant:
GUERRA-BARRCRA E RENE, ITJ TRUCKING, LLC, JOHN DOE 1-10 (FICTICIOUS DEFENDANTS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Beijing Dayou Dingxin Investment Management Partnership, L.P. et al. v. Wang et al.
as 1:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
Beijing Dayou Dingxin Investment Management Partnership, L.P. and Suzhou Youtou Cornerstone Enterprise Management Center, L.P.
Respondent:
Chan Qian Wang and Hao Zhou
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Lor v. County of Siskiyou et al
as 2:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Chan Lor
Defendant:
County of Siskiyou, John Ottenberg and Andrea Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. Lor et al
as 2:2024at00074
Defendant:
Chan Lor, County of Siskiyou, John Ottenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
