Cases 51 - 60 of 396
BURGIS et al v. BAYER CORP., et al
as 2:2016cv03589
Plaintiff:
MANDY BURGIS , AMANDA BURLESON , NATASHA BURNS and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLEVELAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03146
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CLEVELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PARKER v. GREGORY et al
as 2:2016cv02943
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
DARNELL GREGORY, CLEVELAND, ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEVELAND v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
as 2:2016cv00640
Petitioner:
FREDDIE CLEVELAND
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. DORRANCE CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 2:2015cv04601
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
DORRANCE CONSTRUCTION LLC, CLEVELAND DEVELOPMENT LLC and TIKA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SLOAN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, ULLI KLEMM, FAITH AKDEMIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. CLEVELAND et al
as 1:2015cv00148
Plaintiff:
RICCO TURNER
Defendant:
CLEVELAND, JOHN E. WETZEL and NANCY A. GIROUX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEVELAND v. LORD AND TAYLOR
as 2:2014cv05784
Plaintiff:
LATANYA CLEVELAND
Defendant:
LORD AND TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDES et al v. ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05185
Plaintiff:
MARK ANDES and DENNIS CARMASSI
Defendant:
ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION, INC. , JOEL PERESMAN , THE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME MUSEUM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01685
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
