Cases 51 - 60 of 122
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMANDER AND CHIEF JUSTICE V.P. et al
as 2:2019cv00332
Defendant:
COURT OF MILITARY APPEAL, U.S.A., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMANDER AND CHIEF JUSTICE V.P. and FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPHERD v. COX et al
as 1:2019cv00575
Defendant:
CORPORAL HAUSE, C.O. MOORE, SHERIFF DOUG COX and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L SHEPHERD, JR. and DAVID L. SHEPHERD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MELTON v. STATE OF INDIANA HENDRICKS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT./JAIL et al
as 1:2018cv03694
Defendant:
BRETT CLARK, MEGAN MORGAN, JAIL COMMANDER and others
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY STEVEN MELTON, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HECK v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2018cv02939
Plaintiff:
SARA HECK and SARA MARIE HECK
Defendant:
COMMANDER JASON SLODERBECK, SHERIFF MARK BOWEN, MARK BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN et al v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2018cv01794
Defendant:
ALSIP, BAGENSKI, BOULES and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacey v. Starke County Circuit Court
as 3:2018cv00340
Plaintiff:
Terrance E Lacey, Sr
Defendant:
Starke County Police, Starke County Jail Commander, Starke County Jail Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARTHUR v. JAIL COMMANDER
as 2:2018cv00169
Petitioner:
BRENT LELAND ARTHUR
Respondent:
JAIL COMMANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. FOWLER et al
as 1:2018cv00992
Defendant:
ALSIP, LISA ASH, BADE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoemaker v. Rogers et al
as 3:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
Billy Shoemaker
Defendant:
Sheriff Brad Rogers , Commander John Perry and Correct Care Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
