Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Roland Cooke v. The Corporation of the Preside, et al
as 09-16960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLAND COOKE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS and THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS
Doe v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, The et al
as 1:2009cv00351
Plaintiff:
Tom Doe, Tom Doe, Tom Doe and others
Defendant:
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, The, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, The, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Roland Cooke v. The Corporation of the Presid, et al
as 09-16226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLAND COOKE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESSIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS and THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS
Michael J. v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2008cv07553
Plaintiff:
Michael J. and Michael J.
Defendant:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
SAUCIER et al v. CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS
as 1:2008cv00198
Plaintiff:
AGNES SAUCIER and LAWRENCE SAUCIER
Defendant:
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Doe v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2008cv00371
Plaintiff:
Tom Doe and Tom Doe
Defendant:
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Runyan et al v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, The et al
as 1:2007cv02713
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Runyan and Jennifer Ann Centers
Defendant:
Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, The, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The, Bruce LeRoy Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Turpin v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2007cv01650
Plaintiff:
Marylue Turpin
Defendant:
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and Morgan Pavement Maintenance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC v. 3.05 acres of permanent easement located in Pinal County et al
as 2:2007cv02370
Plaintiff:
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC and Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
3.05 acres of permanent easement located in Pinal County, 3.48 acres of temporary construction easement located in Pinal County, Dart Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC v. 2.68 acres of permanent easement located in Pinal County et al
as 2:2007cv02369
Plaintiff:
Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC and Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
2.68 acres of permanent easement located in Pinal County, 4.32 acres of temporary construction easement located in Pinal County, Dart Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
