Cases 51 - 60 of 246
Hudson v. Ohio Department of Correction
as 3:2021cv01577
Plaintiff:
Mitchell D. Hudson
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Sheldon
as 3:2021cv01277
Petitioner:
Mitchell D. Hudson
Respondent:
Warden Ed Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cass v. The United States District Cou
as 21-1227
Defendant / Appellee:
John K. Jordan, Esq., Steven Vaiselberg, C. Platt and others
Defendant:
Hon. Sharen D. Hudson, A.J.S.C., Joyce Slevin, Esq., United States District Court Eastern District of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mickey Cass
David Meyers v. Mosley
as 21-6670
Defendant / Appellee:
GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR MOSLEY, SERGEANT DIAL, MS. DARBY, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Redmon-El v. United States et al
as 3:2021cv50174
Defendant:
L. Woods, Ms. Rimerez, B. Yourkowski and others
Plaintiff:
Malcolm D. Redmon-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Locke v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv03051
Defendant:
R. Echols, B. Root, (fnu) Calkers and others
Plaintiff:
Adam A. Locke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cass v. The United States District Cou
as 21-406
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph Marusak, Frank J. Clark, John K. Jordan and others
Defendant:
Hon. Sharen D. Hudson, A.J.S.C., Robert Sommers, John Fima and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
In the matter of Mickey Cass, In the matter of the United States sui juris
Fuimaona v. Hudson
as 20-3255
Petitioner / Appellant:
SILIAIVAOESE FUIMAONA
Respondent / Appellee:
D. HUDSON, Warden, USP - Leavenworth
Cass v. The United States District Court, Eastern District of New York et al
as 1:2020cv06071
Defendant:
Robert Sommers, Charles J. Hynes, John K. Jordan, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Mickey Cass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ali v. Hudson
as 5:2020cv03291
Plaintiff:
Falasha Ali
Defendant:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
