Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Schmidt v. Des Moines Public Schools et al
as 4:2008cv00477
Plaintiff:
Lisa Schmidt
Defendant:
Des Moines Public Schools, City of Des Moines, James Mollison and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dahlen v. Shelter House et al
as 3:2008cv00124
Plaintiff:
Michael Dahlen
Defendant:
Shelter House, The Iowa City Board of Adjustment and City of Iowa City
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joshua Hammer et al v. Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv04950
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hammer, Joshua Hammer, Thomas R. Keller and others
Defendant:
Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc., Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Dahlen v. City of Bend
as 6:2008cv06032
Plaintiff:
Scott Dahlen
Defendant:
City of Bend and City of Bend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
DAHLEN v. VAPOR, A BRUNSWICK COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv65851
Plaintiff:
THOMAS R. DAHLEN
Defendant:
VAPOR, A BRUNSWICK COMPANY, OWENS-CORNING, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Lussier et al v. Fargo North High School et al
as 3:2007cv00028
Plaintiff:
Mark C Lussier, Brendon Johnson and Carrie Johnson
Defendant:
Fargo North High School, Dan Shultis, Jerry Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
UNITED GOV SEC/INTL v. US MARSHAL SERVICE
as 1:2002cv01484
Plaintiff:
UNITED GOVERNMENT SECURITY OFFICERS OF AMERICA INTERNATIONAL UNION , ANN J. BARKLEY , WILLIAM J. BURGE and others
Defendant:
AKAL SECURITY, INC. and ARES GROUP INCORPORATED
Counter_claimant:
AKAL SECURITY, INC. and ARES GROUP INCORPORATED
Counter_defendant:
HARLEN D. COY , DON E. KEMP , KEITH MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Dahlen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad Co.
as NM/6:00-CV-00124
Plaintiff:
Dahlen
Defendant:
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad Co.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
