Cases 51 - 60 of 194
Williams v. Wexford et al
as 1:2020cv00382
Defendant:
Dr. Mitcheff, IWP, Aramark and others
Plaintiff:
Danika D Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISCHER v. HASENOUR et al
as 1:2020cv02832
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Fischer
Defendant:
WINDROSE HEALTH NETWORK, INC., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Derrick L. Hasenour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Williams v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00692
Petitioner:
Derrick C Williams
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARK v. ZATECKY
as 1:2020cv02208
Petitioner:
DERRICK DARON CLARK
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHUMATE v. MARVIN et al
as 1:2020cv00858
Defendant:
DERRICK MARVIN and DELAWARE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
SHANE ANTHONY SHUMATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Shumate v. Marvin et al
as 1:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Derrick Marvin and Delaware County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Shane Anthony Shumate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00190
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Lee v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00066
Plaintiff:
Derrick Terrell Lee and Derrick T Lee
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail and Moya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KUEBLER et al v. VECTREN CORPORATION et al
as 3:2018cv00113
Defendant:
PATRICK K. MULLEN, VECTREN CORPORATION, , Jr. JAMES H. DEGRAFFENREIDT and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KUEBLER, MATTHEW VONSALZEN, RICHARD SCARANTINO and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NISENHAL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Lee v. St. Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00991
Plaintiff:
Derrick Terrell Lee and Derrick T Lee
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail, Julia Lawson, Keefe Commissary Network and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
