Cases 51 - 60 of 2,614
FBG, LLC v. OPKO Health Inc, LLC, et al
as 24-10493
Plaintiff:
FBG, LLC
Defendant:
OPKO HEALTH, INC., PHILLIP FROST, MARC D. GRODMAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Frost v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Frost
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act - Private Entities Definitions
Brown v. Buckner et al
as 6:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Bertram Lemoyne Brown, Jr
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, South Central Correctional Center, Missouri Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Whimper-Frost v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Joyce Whimper-Frost
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Vaglica v. Radiology Partners Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Vaglica
Defendant:
Radiology Partners Inc., Empire State Radiology, P.C. and Frost-Arnett Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
McCullough v. Graves
as 24-506
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. MCCULLOUGH, JR.
Defendant:
Officer BRIAN GRAVES, Oswego City Police Officer, Officer MICHAELA FROST, Oswego City Police Officer and Officer PRITCHARD, Oswego City Police Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
