Cases 51 - 60 of 747
United States et al v. Poland et al
as 2:2021cv00126
Respondent:
Poland, Warden Sekoh Maat, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frederick Banks v. The BOP Paralegal Specialists & DSCC et al
as 2:2020cv11817
Respondent:
Leeann D Tufte, Alicia Sankey, The BOP Paralegal Specialists & DSCC and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 5:2020cv01487
Respondent:
Warden S. Ma'at, San Antonio Police, Florida State Police and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Ma'at et al
as 2:2020cv01610
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Rivers, S Ma'at, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frederick Banks v. Sekou Ma'at
as 20-4281
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent / Appellee:
SEKOU MA'AT, Warden
Frederick Banks v. The CIA et al
as 2:2020cv10769
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, LA Warden, The CIA and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Ma'at et al
as 2:2020cv03227
Defendant:
Designation & Sentence Computation Center, FCI, DSCC and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Warden
as 1:2020cv00258
Respondent:
Warden, Psychology, Warden S. Ma'at' and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks, Issam Hussein Abu-Ghosh and Issam-Abu Gosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Antonelli et al
as 1:2020cv00243
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prison, Central Intelligence Agency and Antonelli
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Antonelli et al
as 5:2020cv00213
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Intelligence Agency and Antonelli
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
