Cases 51 - 60 of 96
Jones v. Morris et al
as 3:2014cv01157
Plaintiff:
Deangelo M Jones
Defendant:
David G Morris, Lt Best and Alex Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv02028
Plaintiff:
Michael G Morris
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Smith
as 5:2014cv00441
Plaintiff:
Byron G. Morris, Sr.
Defendant:
Debby Ann Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holston v. Laflam et al
as 8:2014cv00704
Plaintiff:
Reginald Holston
Defendant:
C. Laflam, J. Helsley, Aaron Leavins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK v. EB-BAY LOT NO. 1 LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK
Defendant:
EB-BAY LOT NO 1 LLC, JOHN G MORRIS, EDWARD E ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK v. EB-BAY LOT NO. 3, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00060
Plaintiff:
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK
Defendant:
EB-BAY LOT NO 3 LLC, JOHN G MORRIS, EDWARD E ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK v. EB-BAY LOT NO. 2, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK
Defendant:
EB-BAY LOT NO 2 LLC, JOHN G MORRIS, EDWARD E ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK v. HEWETT BAYOU, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK
Defendant:
HEWETT BAYOU LLC, JOHN G MORRIS and EAGLE BAY LANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Florida Department of Corrections, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv14005
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Jackson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Inc., Michael D Crews, A Trevino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruth v. City of Creedmoor et al
as 5:2013cv00862
Plaintiff:
Michael Ruth
Defendant:
City of Creedmoor, Robert G. Morris and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
