Cases 51 - 60 of 75
FINCH v. SULLIVAN
as 1:2011cv01606
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MARTIN FINCH
Defendant:
EMMET G. SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SULLIVAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45321
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR G. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-15264
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00004
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
SULLIVAN et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv82210
Plaintiff:
EVERETT G. SULLIVAN and PHYLLIS SULLIVAN
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivan v. Ballard
as 3:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
Terry G. Sullivan, Jr.
Defendant:
Scott Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutto et al v. South Carolina Retirement System, The et al
as 4:2010cv02018
Plaintiff:
Gail M Hutto , Debra J Andews , Elizabeth W Hodge and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Retirement System, The, Police Officers Retirement System, The, South Carolina Retirement Systems Group Trust, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sullivan v. Fayette County Sheriff's Dept.
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Terry G. Sullivan, Jr.
Defendant:
Fayette County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SULLIVAN V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv36270
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR G SULLIVAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Neville v. New York State Parole Board et al
as 1:2010cv00278
Petitioner:
Henry Neville
Respondent:
New York State Parole Board, G. Sullivan, Dennis Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
