Cases 51 - 60 of 82
McElroy v. Bessemer, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth McElroy
Defendant:
Bessemer, Alabama, City of and Gabriel Kinderknecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gabriel et al v. Life Options International, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00358
Plaintiff:
Robert Gabriel , Joseph Habshey , Mary Shanklin and others
Defendant:
Aragon, n/k/a Veritrust Financial, LLC and AIG Property Casualty Company
Cross_claimant:
VeriTrust
Cross_defendant:
AIG Property Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherman v. Kinderknect
as 2:2014cv00955
Plaintiff:
John Howard Sherman
Defendant:
Gabriel Kinderknect and Daniel Cecil Partridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roebling v. City of Tuscaloosa, AL et al
as 7:2014cv00151
Plaintiff:
Mary Gabrielle Roebling
Defendant:
City of Tuscaloosa, AL, Thomas A Burroughs, J.R. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Boyd v. Captain Gilman et al
as 1:2013cv01528
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Eugene Boyd
Defendant:
Captain Gilman and Lieutenant Burt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. Chapman
as 1:2012cv00663
Plaintiff:
Michael Gabriel Hawk
Defendant:
Tommy Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felix et al v. Martinez Enterprises LLC et al
as 5:2012cv02924
Plaintiff:
Magdalena Felix and Oscar Vazquez
Defendant:
Martinez Enterprises LLC and Gabriel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hawk v. Klaetsch et al
as 1:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Michael Gabriel Hawk
Defendant:
Sean Klaetsch , Trent Robinson , Charlotte Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel Lopez v. The People Of The State Of California
as 1:2012cv00067
Petitioner:
Gabriel Lopez
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
