Cases 51 - 60 of 163
Brown v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06178
Plaintiff:
George Brown
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. , Aramark Facility Services, LLC , Aramark Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017at00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Daniel Brown v. Attorney General United States
as 17-2656
Petitioner:
DANIEL GEORGE BROWN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brown v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv01393
Plaintiff:
William George Brown
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Synthes Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flynn et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2017mc00039
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Harman International Industries, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Brian Flynn , George Brown and Kelly Brown
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
William George Brown v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as CAC/2:17-cv-00468
Plaintiff:
William George Brown
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Synthes, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Flynn et al v. FCA U.S., LLC et al
as 5:2017mc80051
Plaintiff:
Brian Flynn , George Brown , Kelly Brown and others
Defendant:
FCA U.S., LLC and Harman International Industries, Inc
Miscellaneou:
Cisco Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
flynn et al v. FCA US LLC f/k/a Chrysler Group LLC et al
as 5:2017mc50489
Defendant:
FCA US LLC f/k/a Chrysler Group LLC and Harman International Industries, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
brian flynn, George Brown and Kelly Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
