Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Hopkins v. Pang et al
as 4:2010cv05010
Plaintiff:
Glenn Edward Hopkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Pang and A. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rattenbury v. Napurski
as 3:2010cv00458
Plaintiff:
Francine Lynn Rattenbury
Defendant:
Glenn Edward Napurski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2010mc00069
Respondent:
TIMOTHY PAUL ALCORN, PAUL NEJAT ALP, DANIEL BAXTER WANN ALTMAN and others
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Hardy v. Adams
as 1:2009cv01934
Petitioner:
Glenn Edward Hardy
Respondent:
Derral G. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Merrifield v. VA Regional Director et al
as 2:2009cv01389
Plaintiff:
Glenn Edward Merrifield
Defendant:
VA Regional Director and VA Regional Archive Records
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acker v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00377
Plaintiff:
Deborah Acker, Zipporah Acklin, Jamie Seals and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Blanche Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Glenn Whitham v. Larry Norris
as 08-3768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Glenn Edward Whitham
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Glenn Edward Merrifield v. Santa Barbara County Jail
as 2:2008cv05596
Plaintiff:
Glenn Edward Merrifield
Defendant:
- Santa Barbara County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Merrifield v. Santa Barbara County Jail
as 2:2008cv01952
Plaintiff:
Glenn Edward Merrifield
Defendant:
- Santa Barbara County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv87760
Plaintiff:
GLENN EDWARD SMITH
Defendant:
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
