Cases 51 - 60 of 199
Gordon v. Northern Moving Systems, Incorporated
as 3:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Ken J. Gordon, Jr.
Defendant:
Northern Moving Systems, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
JONES v. USA
as 1:2022cv00650
Petitioner:
GORDON RAY JONES, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Guthrie et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Gisele Guthrie, Sandra Gordon, Brenda Brundage and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gordon v. United States of America
as 5:2022hc02107
Petitioner:
Arthur Lorenzo Gordon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Oppenheimer v. Haveles et al
as 1:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Jonathan D Haveles, Margaret Haney Cox, NC Land & Lots LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
OPPENHEIMER v. FRIEDLANDER et al
as 1:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
DAVID GORDON OPPENHEIMER
Defendant:
GREG FRIEDLANDER, AAE MUSIC and AAE HOLDINGS INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
James v. City of Monroe et al
as 3:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Angelia Nikole James
Defendant:
City of Monroe, Bobby G Kilgore, Marion Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oppenheimer v. Marzella et al
as 1:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Paula Marie Marzella and Realty 828, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Oppenheimer v. McDonald et al
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Foster McDonald, Jennifer Blake, Edmund Hillis II and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Oppenheimer v. Patton et al
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Rowena P Patton, Patton Property Group, LLC, Rowena P. Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
