Cases 51 - 60 of 1,475
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hobet Mining, Incorporated v. DOWCP
as 23-1772
Petitioner:
HOBET MINING, INCORPORATED, ARCH RESOURCES and ARCH RESOURCES, INC.
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HAYWARD PAYNE
Dante Hayward v. Brian Mundy, et al
as 23-12214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE BENJAMIN HAYWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN MUNDY, CALEB GROVENSTEIN, F. GATES PEED and others
HAYWARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15393
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HAYWARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAYWARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15206
Plaintiff:
DAVID HAYWARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hayward v. Peed et al
as 4:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Dante Benjamin Hayward
Defendant:
Judge F. Gates Peed, Brian A. Deal and K-9 Sgt. Brian Mundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betham et al v. Avon Products Inc et al
as 1:2023cv04681
Plaintiff:
Alexander Betham, Ms. Lynn Betham and Lynn Betham
Defendant:
Avon Products Inc, ABB, Inc., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Alfa Laval Inc. and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cross Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare LLC and HAYWARD TYLER, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Steven Sloan v. Cody Ballard
as 23-1587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL LEE SLOAN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATES ATTORNEY CODY LARRY BALLARD, SHERIFF TROY BERRY, JUDGE HAYWARD JAMES WEST and others
Defendant:
GOVERNOR WES MOORE, DAWN MOORE and ANGELA BERRY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
