Cases 51 - 60 of 119
McKinney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv00081
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Catherine J McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mario Navarro v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-56899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID LONG, MORENO and others
McKinney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00527
Plaintiff:
Kimberly J. McKinney
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mario Navarro v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-56102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID LONG, MORENO and others
McKinney v. Dzurenda
as 13-1901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William J. McKinney
Defendant:
Unknown
Defendant - Appellee:
James Dzurenda, Warden, Daniel Almeida, CO, Individually and in their Official Capacity, Maggie Gomez, Unit Counselor and others
Jose Lopez v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-17740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, G. D. LEWIS, FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden and others
MCKINNEY v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01438
Plaintiff:
PAMELA J. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
ASSET ACCEPTANCE LLC and GORDON & WEINBERG, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McKinney v. Milling et al
as 3:2012cv01374
Plaintiff:
William J. McKinney
Defendant:
Lynn Milling, Maldonado and Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2012dp23262
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. McKinney
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKinney v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2012cv01224
Plaintiff:
William J. McKinney, Jr.
Defendant:
Bernard Lawrence, Daniel Lynch, Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
