Cases 51 - 60 of 174
Sanders v. Kelley et al
as 5:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanders
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Ray Hobbs, Larry May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fudge v. Harris et al
as 5:2014cv00431
Plaintiff:
James C Fudge
Defendant:
Grant Harris, Moses Jackson, James Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickson v. Gladden et al
as 5:2014cv00409
Plaintiff:
James T Dickson
Defendant:
Chuck Gladden, James Gibson, Marvin Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Boswell v. Claiborne Parish Detention Ctr, et al
as 14-31250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD M. BOSWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CLAIBORNE PARISH DETENTION CENTER, JOHNNY SUMLIN, JOHN GOODWIN and others
Kevin Pearcy v. James Banks, et al
as 14-3338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Ray Pearcy
Defendant - Appellee:
James Banks, Warden, Dermott Unit, ADC and Curtis Meinzer, Deputy Warden, Varner Unit, ADC
Redmon Construction Inc. et al v. Raymond James Bank
as 1:2014cv07593
Plaintiff:
Redmon Construction Inc. and Majed Murad
Defendant:
Raymond James Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2014cv00210
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Curtis
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, James Banks and Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lomax v. Banks et al
as 5:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
Dakota Lomax
Defendant:
James Banks, James Gibson and Marvin Evans, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orlando Thomas v. James Banks, et al
as 14-1624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Orlando Juwan Thomas
Defendant - Appellee:
James Banks, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC, Joe Page, III, Treatment Warden, Varner Unit, ADC, Gary Ralls, Chaplain, Varner Unit, ADC and others
Haley, Mary et al v. Kolbe and Kolbe Millwork Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Mary Haley , Michael Haley , Leslie Banks and others
Defendant:
Kolbe and Kolbe Millwork Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
