Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Crowley v. Board of Prison Terms et al
as 2:2009cv01324
Plaintiff:
Hugh G Crowley
Defendant:
Board of Prison Terms, James Gardner and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MUHAMMAD v. WEIS et al
as 2:2008cv03616
Plaintiff:
AKHI RAHEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
GREGORY T. WEIS, W. ARCH IRVIN, JR., BERNARD J. MCAULEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Geoffrey Atwell v. Thomas Lavan, et al
as 08-2228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEOFFREY WILLARD ATWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, LEE T. BERNARD, II, PATRICIA BLIZZARD and others
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, MARK S. SCHWEIKER, SARAH HART and others
James Gardner v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-67422
Plaintiff:
James Gardner
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc.
Abdullah v. Napolitano, et al
as 08-15305
Petitioner - Appellant:
SEYMOUR J. ABDULLAH
Respondent - Appellee:
JANET NAPOLITANO, TERRY GODDARD, DORA B. SCHRIRO and others
GARDNER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2008cv67422
Plaintiff:
JAMES GARDNER
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gardner v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv00949
Petitioner:
James Gardner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gardner v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2007cv00146
Plaintiff:
James Gardner, Jr.
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Harley G. Lappin and Rebecca Tamez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gardner v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv00269
Plaintiff:
James Gardner, Jr.
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Harley G. Lappin and Rebecca Tamez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gardner v. Tidwell et al
as 5:2007cv00118
Plaintiff:
James Gardner, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Tidwell, Nikbakht, R. Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
