Cases 51 - 60 of 98
McKinney et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00829
Plaintiff:
Heather McKinney and Kevin James McKinney
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. Parry-Jones et al
as 1:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Belinda Parry-Jones, James McKinney, Steve Zdrazil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cross v. McKinney
as 3:2015cv03138
Plaintiff:
Horace Michael Cross
Defendant:
James McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. McKinney
as 3:2015cv03137
Petitioner:
Stephen C Leonard
Respondent:
James McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Isarel Flatford, et al v. UAW, Local 663, et al
as 15-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAREL FLATFORD, JENNIFER ABEL, FRANKLIN ANDERSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 663, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA and GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
James McKinney v. Bonita Hoffner
as 15-1374
Petitioner - Appellee:
JAMES MCKINNEY
Respondent - Appellant:
BONITA J. HOFFNER
Wright v. McKinney Per Order at [4] Respondent has 30 days from date amended petition filed to file answer. Clerk to set briefing schedule when answer filed.
as 3:2015cv03103
Petitioner:
Jerel Lamar Wright
Respondent:
James McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doss v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv03084
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Doss
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, James McKinney, Jana Hacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Parry-Jones et al
as 1:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Belinda Parry-Jones , James McKinney , Steve Zdrazil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
