Cases 51 - 60 of 1,400
Houston v. Hilton et al
as 3:2012mc00012
Plaintiff:
Clifford Leon Houston
Defendant:
Stacia Hilton, James Thomas Fowler, Ronald Gibbs and others
City and County of San Francis, et al v. USPS, et al
as 12-15490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE, SAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION and HOUSING RIGHTS COMMITTE OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and MICHAEL DALEY
City and County of San Francis, et al v. USPS, et al
as 12-15473
Plaintiff:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE, SAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION and HOUSING RIGHTS COMMITTE OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER and MICHAEL DALEY
Oscar Dantzler v. EEOC, et al
as 12-5060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oscar Dantzler
Defendant - Appellee:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Keith Hills, Agent Does One-Five and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Houston v. Hilton et al (TV2)
as 3:2012mc00008
Plaintiff:
Clifford Leon Houston
Defendant:
Stacia Hilton, James Thomas Fowler, Ronald Gibbs and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
