Cases 51 - 60 of 857
KARIDIS et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03277
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HERR, DONALD HAMMOCK, AUSTIN KANG and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NESSMITH et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03077
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOWLES, ALLAN EUROZA, DANIEL YOON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Karidis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02227
Plaintiff:
William Herr, Donald Hammock, Austin Kang and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Nessmith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02081
Plaintiff:
James Bowles, Allan Euroza, Daniel Yoon and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
River Light V, L.P. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv04506
Plaintiff:
River Light V, L.P. and Tory Burch LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Marie Robinson, Linda Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
DEWITT et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01384
Plaintiff:
ROGER FRIZELL, TEIGAN MEDINA, JOHN EGGLESTON and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dewitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00992
Plaintiff:
Roger Frizell, Teigan Medina, John Eggleston and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Nagel v. Janvier et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Lexolution Client Associate, Manpower Attorney 13 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Corizon LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Johnson
Defendant:
CORIZON LLC, Tom Bredman, Milton Hammerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
