Cases 51 - 60 of 282
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
OGELSBY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv05598
Petitioner:
LAMAR OGELSBY
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
AURSBY v. LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv04849
Defendant:
SHAWN WIELAGE, ERIC FRIES, WARREN M. YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY LAMAR AURSBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN v. BETANCOURT et al
as 2:2019cv04670
Defendant:
JEFFREY WITHELDER, DR. PHILLIPS, MARIEL TRIMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
LAMAR A. GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN v. GEORGE W. HILL (CERT TEAM) CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2019cv04671
Plaintiff:
LAMAR A. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
LT. MOODY, GEORGE W. HILL (CERT TEAM) CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, OFFICER SIRODEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. TUNEBERG et al
as 2:2019cv01269
Respondent:
KENDRICK LAMAR, KIMBA, CIA and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Tuneberg et al
as 1:2019cv01678
Respondent:
Kendrick Lamar, Kimba, CIA and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WHITFIELD et al v. SHARON HILL BOROUGH et al
as 2:2019cv04217
Defendant:
P/O JOHN DOE 6, P/O JOHN DOE 2, P/O JOHN DOE 1 and others
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WHITFIELD and ASHLEY MCCLINTOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
