Cases 51 - 60 of 992
Miller et al v United States of America
as 1:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
Edward P. Miller, Sr. and Kathy S. Miller
Defendant:
The United States of Amercia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Certificate No. PL1007017 v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2021cv00344
Defendant:
Job Ouma, Steve Cooper, Erick Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Certificate No. PL1007017
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Commissioner of W.V.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00240
Defendant:
John Sines, Brian Reed, Kim Blair and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew W. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holbrook v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2021cv00170
Defendant:
Major Flemming, Albright, Endicott and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friendly Hempsters LLC v. Fleur De Leaf Kentucky et al
as 2:2021cv00187
Defendant:
Alexander Jacob Miller, John Liter, Dave Wicking and others
Plaintiff:
Friendly Hempsters LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Searls
as 3:2021cv00025
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Petitioner:
Keith L. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rush v. Davis-Stuart, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
Anethra Coleman, Anthony Dalmer, Scott Brewer and others
Defendant:
Davis-Stuart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Miller v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00059
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, CO Dale Griffith, Counselor Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
as 2:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Miller
Defendant:
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
