Cases 51 - 60 of 267
Grigsby v. Howard et al
as 4:2021cv00266
Petitioner:
Philip Andra Grigsby
Respondent:
Catricia Howard, A Torres, G Merrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Todd v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2021cv01144
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Ramael Todd also known as Ramael Blackwell El Trust doing business as Ronnie Ramael Todd doing business as Ramael Blackwell El and Ramael Blackwell El Trust
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Estate of Ronnie Ramael Todd, Estate of Ryan Ramael Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Allen et al
as 2:2021cv01160
Plaintiff:
Shantae Marie Phillips
Defendant:
Candra Allen, Tiana Allen, Davisha Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cobb v. Howard et al
as 4:2021cv00241
Defendant:
J Cox, V Ramsey, K Werner and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kraft v. Chevron Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00575
Defendant:
International Credit Recovery Incorporated, Valley Pacific Petroleum Systems Incorporated, Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Clervrain v. Brnovich et al
as 4:2021cv00150
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Rachel Chapa, JA Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tauscher et al v. Donison et al
as 2:2020cv02014
Defendant:
Joseph Kreamer, VIP Mortgage, Benjamin Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline M Tauscher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mitchell #311348 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01811
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Mark R Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. USA
as 3:2020cv08217
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lezmond Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
