Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00269
Defendant:
Google Inc., Match.Com LLC, Softlayer Technologies, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Red Hat, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC
Undetermined:
Hesha Abrams, Robert W Faulkner and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
v. Easyweb Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02027
Plaintiff:
Easyweb Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Blip Networks, Inc., Buzz Media, Dropshots, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
FPX, LLC v. Google, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00142
Plaintiff:
FPX, LLC
Defendant:
Google, Inc., YouTube, LLC, AOL, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
JULIE C. RIGGS v. MYSPACE, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03073
Plaintiff:
JULIE C. RIGGS
Defendant:
MYSPACE, INC., News Corporation, Tom Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RIGGS v. MYSPACE, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
JULIE C. RIGGS
Defendant:
MYSPACE, INC., NEWS CORPORATION and TOM ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Myspace, Inc. v. Wallace et al
as 3:2008mc00037
Plaintiff:
Myspace, Inc.
Defendant:
Sanford Wallace, Walter Rines, Online Turbo Merchant, Inc. and others
Phenomenon Licensing, et al v. MySpace Inc.
as 08-4189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHENOMENON LICENSING and DONNELL MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MYSPACE INC.
Phenomenon Licensing, et al v. MySpace Inc.
as 08-4191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHENOMENON LICENSING and DONNELL MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MYSPACE INC.
MySpace, Inc. v. Wallace et al
as 1:2008mc00045
Plaintiff:
MySpace, Inc. and MySpace, Inc.
Defendant:
Sanford Wallace, Walter Rines, Online Turbo Merchant, Inc. and others
Doe v. MySpace, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00140
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, IX, Jane Doe, IX and Jane Doe, IX
Defendant:
MySpace, Inc. and MySpace, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.