Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Mark Downey v. Mark Herring
as 19-1906
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN MACISAAC, Arlington County, Virginia County Attorney, ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK DOWNEY
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF VIRGINIA DOWNEY
Tippens v. Herring
as 3:2019cv00614
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Tippens, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Herring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirleaf et al v. Northam et al
as 8:2019cv02376
Defendant:
Mark Herring, Ralph Northam, Lynda Burrows and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Israel and Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SIRLEAF v. NORTHAM et al
as 1:2019cv02525
Defendant:
LYNDA BURROWS, DOES #1-7, MARK HERRING and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Clarke et al
as 1:2019cv00942
Respondent:
Harold Clarke and Mark Herring
Petitioner:
Jerry E. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hommel v. Unknown, et al
as 7:2019cv00469
Respondent:
S. Hughes Melton, Mark Herring, Jason Wilson and others
Petitioner:
Brandon K. Hommel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Howard White v. Lynda Burrows
as 19-6783
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY TAPP, individually and official capacity, LYNDA BURROWS, individually and official capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (ExRel) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD WHITE
Hommel v. Unknown
as 3:2019cv00386
Petitioner:
Brandon K. Hommel
Respondent:
U.S. District Court Northern District of Ohio, Dr. S. Hughes Melton, Mark Herring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tippens v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2019cv00369
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Tippens, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Herring, Cortez Hernandas, VA D.O.C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00194
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
