Cases 51 - 60 of 288
Halter v. Newton et al
as 7:2020cv00493
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail Authority, Captain Powell, Sgt. Brandon Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel N. Halter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penaloza v. Streeval et al
as 7:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Officer Brooks, Lieutenant Childers, C. Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Penaloza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coleman v. Funkhouser, et al
as 6:2020cv00049
Plaintiff:
Zachary R. Coleman
Defendant:
Sheriff Steve Funkhouser, Derek Almarode, Unknown Number of John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2020cv00414
Petitioner:
Clay Marshall Curtis
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00029
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earquhart v. United States Marshalls for the Eastern District North Carolina et al
as 1:2020cv00620
Respondent:
United States Marshalls for the Eastern District North Carolina and Piedmont Regional Jail
Petitioner:
Xavier Milton Earquhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jennings v. U.S. Homeland Security et al
as 2:2020cv00276
Petitioner:
Brandon Marquis Jennings and Mustafa Bey
Respondent:
U.S. Government, U.S. of America, U.S. Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marshall v. Burlingame
as 6:2020cv00033
Respondent:
Canal Insurance Company (UIM Carrier)
Defendant:
Betty J. Burlingame
Plaintiff:
Levi Lane Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis v. Unknown
as 2:2020cv00224
Petitioner:
Clay Marshall Curtis
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2020cv00057
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Shawn Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
