Cases 51 - 60 of 311
Farmer v. BOP Director et al
as 3:2021cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah S. Farmer
Defendant:
BOP Director, Regional, U.S.P. Hazelton Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Duggins v. Antonelli et al
as 1:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Lt. Marshall, Director Michael Carvajal, B.M. Antonelli and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew G. Duggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bertrand v. Marshall County Commission et al
as 5:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Terry McDiffitt, Marshall County Commission and Janet Pest
Plaintiff:
Ruth Bertrand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Hudgins et al
as 5:2020cv00263
Petitioner:
Corey S. Reed
Respondent:
R. Hudgins, U.S. Marshalls and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00786
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Peterson v. Tincher et al
as 2:2020cv00787
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Marshall Tincher and Correctional Officer Russell Parker, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Quinton Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butterfield v. University Physicians & Surgeons, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00759
Plaintiff:
Michelle Butterfield
Defendant:
University Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. doing business as Marshall Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Underwood v. Copenhaver et al
as 2:2020cv00727
Defendant:
C.I. Kristina N. Sheldon, Sergeant Trivia Divita, Jennifer Rada Herrald and others
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barker v. Keeley et al
as 3:2020cv00202
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney's Office Northern District of West Virginia, Irene Keeley, U.S. Marshals Service Northern District of West Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Scott Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
